Panel recommends investigation

From the Panel on Sexual Abuse Prevention

In the interest of being transparent and diligent in our work as the Panel on Sexual Abuse Prevention, we share the following update:

Our panel formed in January 2016. We plan to meet May 14–15 in Harrisonburg, Virginia, for our first in-person meeting. We chose this location due to our panel members’ schedules, not because of the news surrounding Luke Hartman.

Our panel was formed to work on implementing the Churchwide Statement on Sexual Abuse passed in Kansas City in 2015. In the statement we as a church committed to “tell the truth about sexual abuse; hold abusers accountable; acknowledge the seriousness of their sin; listen with care to those who have been wounded; protect vulnerable persons from injury; work restoratively for justice.” These are challenging commitments. But as a panel and as a church, they are our guide in confronting sexual abuse in the church.

Because of our work within the denomination, our areas of expertise and our priorities as a panel, we want to clarify that we will not be investigating the situation while we are in Harrisonburg or afterward.

While Hartman is not credentialed through a Mennonite Church USA area conference, he was a leader, speaker and administrator — and we take that seriously.

Therefore, we publicly recommend that — in coordination with the Mennonite Church USA Executive Board and Mennonite Education AgencyEastern Mennonite University, Virginia Mennonite Conference and Lindale Mennonite Church seek out and cooperate with an investigation by an outside organization in a timely manner. We invite the Mennonite Church USA Executive Board and Mennonite Education Agency to hold these institutions accountable in this process. We also recommend that the cost be absorbed by all the parties.

An independent investigation would aim to:

  • Create space for survivors’ stories to lead to responsible action and change among our institutions.
  • Expose the truth of what happened, avoiding speculation and taking sides based on incomplete stories.
  • Lead all involved institutions toward consistently following clearer, stronger and more obvious prevention, reporting and accountability policies.
  • Build the integrity of institutions who cooperate with the investigation.

We recommend: GRACE: Godly Response to Abuse in the Christian Environment, an organization that conducts independent and objective abuse-related investigations; FaithTrust Institute; or another panel-approved independent organization with expertise in sexual abuse policy and response.

Finally, the Churchwide Statement on Sexual Abuse reads, “In our discipline processes we struggle to find ways to support survivors as they reclaim their lives. We have often failed to focus first on their needs; we lament our tendency to give more attention to the perpetrator than to victims and survivors.” We as a panel want to publicly state that we support Lauren Shifflett and all other victims/survivors in our midst.


See also other posts related to sexual abuse prevention.

Official comments policy for users of Mennonite Church USA’s websites and other social networking tools. We reserve the right to remove any comment that violates this policy.

  • The purpose of comments is to engage in constructive dialogue.
  • Please provide your own full name.
  • Be respectful. If you’re offering criticism, focus on others’ ideas — not their motives, person, character or faith. Consider the log in your own eye before pressing ‘Enter.’

Comments are moderated. Comments with any content that is deemed obscene, libelous, defamatory or hateful toward an individual or group will not be approved. Comments will remain open for 10 days.

3 thoughts on “Panel recommends investigation

  1. Thank you for this recommendation which is the clearest statement yet, acknowledging victimization, broken boundaries, half-truths, and institutional preservation at the expense of the victims involved. As a former two term Associate Trustee for EMU and as a former 10 year Associate Pastor at Lindale, I ask that all the parties named fully cooperate with this recommendation for an independent investigation.

  2. I’d like to know what we, as a church, are doing to keep each other accountable, especially those who have taken advantage of their power positions (Pastors, Professors, Psychiatrists, Psychologists, Counselors, Spiritual Directors, Teachers, Adult Relatives of anybody) to act out sexual addictions/dysfunctions/brokenness/sinfulness that causes harm to others, themselves & their families & the churches they attend?

    I would like your “Panel” to devise a simple required Mennonite Church Practice of ongoing follow up with whatever church the Offender decides to attend no matter how many times they switch church attendance & job site to inform said churches & job sites of this person’s abusive practices. This is not rocket science this is what we are called to be if we want to be The Body of Christ:

    1 John 1:5-10
    5 This is the message we have heard from him and declare to you: God is light; in him there is no darkness at all. 6 If we claim to have fellowship with him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not live out the truth. 7 But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all [or every] sin.
    8 If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. 9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. 10 If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us.

  3. As an alum of EMU, a member of a congregation in Virginia Mennonite Conference and someone with friends at Lindale, I, too ask that all the parties named fully cooperate with this recommendation for an independent investigation.

    For those of us in churches that have sought both education and policy on child sexual abuse, it is painful to see statements and mishandling of cases that show a lack of attention to this issue. It also shows a preference for keeping things silent and focusing on, indeed enabling the offender. Mishandling of cases by leaders leaves more harm in it’s wake, for everyone.

Comments are closed.