Jesus doesn’t need a denomination, but you might

Glen Alexander GuytonGlen Guyton is chief operating officer for Mennonite Church USA.

The leadership education department at Duke University asks a good question: What’s the future of denominations? As a current denominational leader on an unsteady ship I probably think about this every single day and twice on Monday. As a former pastor I think, “Do I really need BIG denomination? Local ministry is where it is at.” All Jesus needed was 12 dudes (maybe 11), a donkey and a wooden cross to change the world. So why put so much time and energy into an institution? Am I being a wise steward by investing my limited resources into the religious bureaucracy of denominationalism?

Some say that denominations are the arbiters of religious truth. I am not sure I agree with that. Truth can be quite relative and is often based on who is telling the story. The executive director of Global Mission for the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) says denominations are a source of identity, the lenses through which everything is viewed: scripture, church and society. Many of my Anabaptist friends would agree with that definition to a fault. Mennonite/Anabaptist identity is strong and, unless it is wrapped in that Anabaptist wrapper, the perception is, it just is not the proper way of being the church. Often denominationalism has been used to define God rather than the other way around. But the understanding of denominations that I like most is from United Methodist Church (UMC) bishop Gregory Palmer: “Denominations will always exist, because they provide cohesiveness and capacity – the ability to bring resources together and leverage them to do enormous good.”

While the God we serve is still omnipotent, the world we live in is transformed by its stewards, human beings.

No, Jesus Christ does not need the strength of a denomination to transform the world, but strong denominations have great capacity to show the world the transformative power of Jesus Christ.

Many current denominations have become so obsessed with a single doctrinal issue that they have forgotten how to be light-hearted and carefree in their approach to sharing the gospel. Grayde Parsons of Presbyterian Church (USA) stated that, “There will be a ‘leveling out’ in the future as the emphasis shifts from clergy, buildings and the white middle class to a more empowered lay leadership, a variety of venues and a more expansive view of who God has called to be God’s people.”

In the future, denominations will have to become more like caretakers and less like rule-makers.

Denominational leaders and the laity who create the expectations that the leaders follow will have to build up the lives of people instead of building inanimate brick-and-mortar edifices.

Ultimately the people who the denomination serves must be held accountable for the relevance and function of the denomination that they are a part of. They must appoint leaders who speak for them. They must examine founding documents and they must collectively challenge the status quo. According to some reports there are over 2,000 Christian denominations active in the United States. That means there are over 2,000 groups of people who at some point said, “We understand the gospels and Jesus Christ better than you. Our interpretive lens is the clearest one.” Even as I type this blog, my denomination, Mennonite Church USA seems to be slowly fracturing and new groups are forming. In a few years I am sure those splinter groups will split and turn into even smaller denominations. Our fractured religious denominations begin to lose value, like money in a bad economy. Religious institutions that once had the power of a $100 bill, have split to having no more influence than a 50-cent piece. Today the issue is sexuality, but tomorrow it might be something else like woman in leadership (Did we get that one solved?).

Maybe the problem is that we quaintly define our conflicts as “issues” and we avoid addressing the impact our decisions have on real people.

But, we do need denominations, because like Bishop Palmer said, “they provide cohesiveness and capacity – the ability 2015 8 27 tower-of-babel-19-jun-091to bring resources together and leverage them to do enormous good.”

Just think what we could do if we, as Christians, were all working together with a unified purpose and unified resources.

I wonder what that would be like.

But the Lord came down to look at the city and the tower the people were building.  ‘Look!’ he said. ‘The people are united, and they all speak the same language. After this, nothing they set out to do will be impossible for them!’” Genesis 11:5-6 (NLT).

Ah, we probably couldn’t handle that either, right? Eventually someone would try to put themselves in the place of God.

Official comments policy for users of Mennonite Church USA’s websites and other social networking tools. We reserve the right to remove any comment that violates this policy.

  • The purpose of comments is to engage in constructive dialogue.
  • Please provide your own full name.
  • Be respectful. If you’re offering criticism, focus on others’ ideas — not their motives, person, character or faith. Consider the log in your own eye before pressing ‘Enter.’

Comments are moderated. Comments with any content that is deemed obscene, libelous, defamatory or hateful toward an individual or group will not be approved. Comments will remain open for 10 days.


6 thoughts on “Jesus doesn’t need a denomination, but you might

  1. I have a ministry in India. I needed funds for daily needs and to construct five Church buildings.
    The big problem I have been facing with denominations. If I am from such and such denomination, then they will agree to sponsor to construct a church.
    Most of the denominations are willing to do anything for their denominationations. I think, devil is very happy to keep us busy with this denominational sentiments.

  2. Lots of wisdom here, Glen; thank you. Very worthwhile.

    Last evening I participated in a meeting of 250-300 people at a local meetinghouse where we discussed the recommendation of Lancaster Mennonite Conference leaders to withdraw from MCUSA. At this meeting, I heard frequent affirmation of two additional aspects of our denomination that are highly valued: (1) the human relationships we share, developed through shared experiences over time; and (2) the perspective and learning we gain about faithfulness to Jesus as we interact with followers who see things differently than we do.

    To restate that last point, iron sharpens iron.

  3. Glen spoke clearly, especially when he said (we Mennonites) ” are obsessed with doctrinal issues and forget to be light-hearted and carefree” in sharing Jesus.

  4. A very fine piece. In our interdenominational relationships it would be good to ask ourselves, what do we have to contribute to other church groups,? It is good to see an increased emphasis among many on discipleship of the risen Lord. Myron Augsburger

Comments are closed.